#Dragon age vs the witcher plus#

For example, these cookies let us recognize that you have created an account and have logged into that account. Necessary cookies allow us to offer you the best possible experience when accessing and navigating through our website and using its features. What types of cookies do we use? Necessary cookies It will contain some anonymous information such as a unique identifier, websiteвЂ™s domain name, and some digits and numbers. Each cookie is unique to your web browser. What are cookies?Д¬ookies are simple text files that are stored on your computer or mobile device by a websiteвЂ™s server. By visiting you agree that may use cookies to be processed by Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika. that being said, we do not foresee playing witcher 3.Please read this cookie policy carefully before using operated by us. am not gonna be too hypocritical 'bout indulging in fantasy, eh? nevertheless, the self-deluded pretension that for some makes witcher a property more deserving o' consideration 'cause o' its maturity is laughable.Д¬an't vote- haven't played either game. is nothing wrong with liking such a game- it is a fantasy after all. is nothing wrong with making a game that is actual pandering to the lowest common denominator. is immature to a comical degree but somehow it gets mislabeled as mature 'cause it is bloody and gratuitous and cynical. witcher is a self-indulgent, teenage boys' waking wet dream/power fantasy. Look, we know some folks is great fans o' witcher 'cause it is dark and mature and. the witcher 2 combat were shallow to the point that the player involvement became nothing more than a repetitive chore with startling speed.

the thing is, we didn't hate the main character more than we hated everything else.

#Dragon age vs the witcher plus#

Plus the romance and sex stuff is stupid.Д¬halk us up as somebody who couldn't get through witcher 2. It would be nice if they lightened it up a bit. Yeah, that's basically my issue with the series.ДЄlso, both of these fantasy worlds are super depressing. I don't mind being forced to play a fixed character, so long as it's not a character I hate. I haven't played Witcher 3 because I hated Witcher 2. TW3 allowed you to converse with various friends/companions, but not always whenever you wanted, and the dialogue got exhausted pretty quick. The only edge I'd give DAI - and this is more of a personal thing than any sort of bad game design thing - is you had more dialogue/interactions with your party companions. The Inquisition characters, particularly the women, walked like apes and were as ugly as sin. The Witcher characters actually moved like regular folks. More time and effort was put into the main story, so it didn't feel rushed.ДЄnd the character models weren't even close. The main story was also more coherent in TW3. like you were never really in an open environment, but rather various tracks through a map. In DAI, the maps were broken up and each map felt. In TW3, it actually felt like you were traveling across the continent. The Witcher 3 succeeded where Dragon Age Inquisition failed miserably when it came to open world and sidequests associated with the open world.